Blog

Hand typed on typewriter on green background with copy space. Concept of work on typewriter. Art collage digital pop modern art

Across Europe, and especially in Switzerland, the healthcare landscape is undergoing a subtle but profound shift. Insurance companies increasingly rely on consulting firms to decide which services deserve reimbursement. On the surface this seems rational: only what is strongly evidence-based should be paid for. But in practice, this logic distorts what is truly valuable in the healthcare system.Nowhere is this more visible than in the use of imaging. MRI scans, X-rays, CTs &nbsp;these technical procedures are performed and reimbursed with unquestioned confidence, regardless of whether they change anything about a diagnosis or treatment. Machines inspire trust; they carry an aura of precision and objectivity. Technology is considered valuable almost by default.Therapeutic work, however, tells a very different story. The moment a human being offers time, attention, touch, connection or communication, the system becomes skeptical. Therapies must be justified, defended, rationalized. Sessions are questioned. Intentions are doubted. Interventions are scrutinized. The underlying message is clear: what cannot be measured easily cannot be trusted fully.This pattern aligns closely with what Saifedean Ammous describes in The Fiat Standard. In centrally controlled systems with tightening budgets and expanding bureaucracy, the value of human work is gradually diminished. Standardized, academic, machine-driven procedures rise in importance because they are easier to control and quantify. Trust in machines becomes cheap, while trust in humans becomes expensive. And yet healing still happens in the space between people, not in the codes and forms designed to categorize them.Therapists experience this reality every day not because their work is less meaningful, but because it does not fit neatly into academic checklists or reimbursement structures. A conversation cannot be captured in a billing code. A grounded, calming presence cannot be described in a claims form. A moment of genuine connection resists quantification. And because of this, human work is often minimized or tightly regulated, while technological interventions pass untouched.When instructors say that therapists must “reposition themselves,” they are pointing at this fundamental imbalance. The future of therapeutic professions will not be shaped by insurance companies or bureaucratic systems. It will be shaped by trust, real outcomes, human interaction, access, transparency and freedom of choice the things that have always mattered, and always will.This is exactly where a new kind of space is emerging: a health space not regulated by centralized incentives but shaped by direct human connection. A space where the quality of the relationship matters more than the quality of the paperwork. Where therapists are not defined by codes but by their impact. And where patients choose not based on bureaucracy, but based on trust.TheraMatch is born from this idea. Not as an opponent of the current system, but as an alternative to its limitations. It offers a place where therapists can work in integrity, where patients can choose freely, and where healing is not reduced to checklists but re-centered on human experience. By using Bitcoin as an open, global value-transfer system, TheraMatch enables fair, direct and borderless exchange without gatekeepers, pre-approvals or fiat-driven restrictions.In a healthcare world that increasingly trusts machines and questions humans, we need a parallel path&nbsp;one that protects the essence of healing. TheraMatch represents this shift: decentralized, human-first, independent and rooted in real impact.Healing has always existed between people. Everything else should support it — not control it.

The Hidden Crisis in Healthcare: Why Insurance Systems Reward Machines and Undervalue Human Healing

Throughout history, people have looked to “experts” for financial wisdom — economists, bankers, politicians, central bankers, investment managers. And yet, time and again, these very authorities have failed spectacularly.The authority bias &nbsp;our instinct to obey or believe people in power has cost societies trillions.&nbsp; When Experts Fail In 2008, nearly every major bank and financial institution claimed that the global economy was stable. They built complex models, issued confident forecasts, and dismissed early warnings. Then the entire system collapsed and millions lost their savings, homes, and trust.The same pattern repeats across industries: Medical experts once prescribed cigarettes for stress. Economists praised money printing as “stimulus.” Politicians promised stability through more control and delivered inflation, inequality, and surveillance.Each time, the crowd followed authority instead of logic.&nbsp; Milgram’s Lesson in Modern Form Stanley Milgram’s 1961 obedience experiment revealed a dark truth: Ordinary people will harm others when told to do so by someone in authority. Today, we see the same dynamic in economic and political decisions people accept financial manipulation, debt slavery, or censorship because someone in a suit told them it’s for their safety.Authority feels safe but that’s the illusion.&nbsp; Why Bitcoin Breaks the Spell Bitcoin represents the opposite of authority bias. It has no CEO, no board, no central figure to obey. Its creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, remains anonymous deliberately removing personality from the system.Bitcoin doesn’t ask for trust it offers verification. It doesn’t rely on “experts” but on mathematics and consensus. It’s a living experiment in critical thinking:“Don’t trust. Verify.” In a world where financial and political institutions constantly fail us, Bitcoin shows that truth doesn’t need a face it needs transparency.&nbsp; Lessons Beyond Money The aviation industry learned that safety improves when authority is questioned. So did medicine, engineering, and science. The healthiest systems are peer-reviewed, open-source, and self-correcting not hierarchical.Bitcoin embodies that principle: a global, decentralized network where anyone can join, question, and verify. No titles, no uniforms, no ego just code and consensus.&nbsp; The Takeaway Authority bias is comfortable until it costs you freedom. Decentralization is uncomfortable until it gives you truth. Rolf Dobelli’s insight isn’t anti-authority; it’s pro-awareness. Trust expertise, but not blindly. Respect teachers, not idols. And remember: in systems built on verification rather than obedience, human progress accelerates.&nbsp; Final Thought The world doesn’t need more leaders to follow. It needs more minds willing to think. Bitcoin is a mirror for that mindset a reminder that truth doesn’t come from authority, it comes from clarity, curiosity, and courage.

Don’t Bow to Authority: What Bitcoin Teaches Us About Thinking for Yourself

bitcoin payment - person using smart phone to pay with crypro

<h2>Introduction to TheraMatch and Bitcoin</h2>In today's fast-paced digital world, the way we handle payments is evolving rapidly. TheraMatch, a pioneer in healthcare innovation, is at the forefront of this transformation by integrating Bitcoin into their payment system. This approach not only enhances convenience but also ensures a more secure and transparent transaction process for both patients and healthcare providers.The adoption of Bitcoin in healthcare might seem unconventional, but it offers numerous benefits that can revolutionize how we perceive and manage health payments. Let’s explore how TheraMatch is leading this change.<figure id="figure-p2g62z89kjimholqkki"><img id="p2g62z89kjimholqkki" src="https://media.gettyimages.com/id/2238679993/photo/bitcoin-symbols-with-neon-outline.jpg?b=1&s=2048x2048&w=0&k=20&c=9MApr1CjXpFXuRy6UgWFB2IhAHnD6eZ2kBIMfM5Q1Ig=" alt="Bitcoin Symbols with Neon Outline" title="Bitcoin Symbols with Neon Outline" class="object-cover bg-gray-100 " style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: center center;" data-corners="default" data-aspect="16:9" data-caption="" data-positionX="null" data-positionY="null" data-fullWidth="false"/></figure><h2>The Benefits of Bitcoin in Healthcare Payments</h2><h3>Enhanced Security and Privacy</h3>One of the most significant advantages of using Bitcoin is its enhanced security. Traditional payment methods often expose sensitive patient information to risks, but Bitcoin transactions are encrypted and decentralized, providing an additional layer of security. This protects patient data from potential breaches.<h3>Cost Efficiency</h3>Bitcoin transactions can significantly reduce costs associated with traditional payment methods. By eliminating intermediaries like banks, TheraMatch can minimize transaction fees, making healthcare more affordable for patients. This cost efficiency is a crucial step towards accessible healthcare for all.<figure id="figure-1ird5279pkmholqs62"><img id="1ird5279pkmholqs62" src="https://cdn.durable.co/getty/3aGHkLvomYv0RUAkVmBcpgQoDTB3D3e6M0zwZZaoXPhp3n1lu00PUfIFxm7HKqas.jpeg" alt="cost efficiency" class="object-cover bg-gray-100 " style="aspect-ratio: 16/9;" data-mce-src="https://cdn.durable.co/getty/3aGHkLvomYv0RUAkVmBcpgQoDTB3D3e6M0zwZZaoXPhp3n1lu00PUfIFxm7HKqas.jpeg" data-mce-style="aspect-ratio: 16/9;"></figure><h2>How TheraMatch Implements Bitcoin Payments</h2><h3>User-Friendly Platform</h3>TheraMatch has developed a user-friendly platform that simplifies Bitcoin transactions for both patients and healthcare providers. The platform is designed to be intuitive, ensuring that even those unfamiliar with cryptocurrencies can easily navigate and complete their payments.<h2>The Future of Health Payments</h2>As more healthcare providers recognize the benefits of Bitcoin, we can expect a significant shift in the industry’s approach to payments. This shift not only promises to enhance efficiency but also aligns with the global move towards digital currencies.TheraMatch’s innovative approach serves as a model for other healthcare organizations looking to modernize their payment systems. By embracing Bitcoin, they are setting a precedent for a more secure, cost-effective, and transparent healthcare payment system.<h2>Conclusion</h2>In conclusion, the integration of Bitcoin into health payments by TheraMatch is a groundbreaking development. It addresses key issues such as security, cost, and accessibility, paving the way for a new era in healthcare transactions. As this trend continues to grow, patients and providers alike will benefit from a more efficient and secure payment ecosystem.

Revolutionizing Health Payments with Bitcoin: The TheraMatch Approach

Schalun Castle Ruins (Wildschloss) above Vaduz, Liechtenstein

Inspired by Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein, “The State in the Third Millennium”Indirect democracy remains power politics. Even with elections, real power often lies in a symbiosis of monarchy and oligarchy. From the outside, it’s unclear who truly governs — presidents, party leaders, financiers, judges, or parliaments. The form of legitimacy changes, but the structure of control stays the same.Why nationalism and socialism rose. Because oligarchies resisted giving people more power, populist ideologies filled the void. Emotion and ideology mobilized the masses more easily than rational democratic reform. The result: ever-expanding bureaucracies, layers of laws, swelling taxes, and debt cycles whenever tax cuts were politically popular.Globalization makes old ideologies obsolete. Nationalism and socialism are two sides of the same worthless coin. Global integration erodes their meaning. Free trade creates shared prosperity; protectionism and subsidies may look patriotic but impoverish nations in the long run.The state is not a company &nbsp;it’s a monopoly. The common analogy of “state as enterprise” fails: shareholders can sell their stock citizens can only emigrate. Modern states behave like private monopolies, writing the rules, acting as both referee and player. This leads to vote-buying politics, short-term promises, and long-term crises.The path forward: If oligarchy dominates, the only solution is to strengthen monarchy and democracy &nbsp;not as nostalgia, but as balance.A constitutional monarchy with democratic legitimacy allows long-term stability beyond election cycles. Direct democracy and local self-determination give real power back to communities. Only then can the state become a service organization for its people, not an instrument of exploitation.The state as an aircraft. When a plane crashes, we improve the design, not just blame the pilot. Likewise, we need structural redesign, not scapegoating. The goal: systems that are safe, resilient, and serve all.The blueprint for the future state:Prevent wars and civil wars. Serve the entire population, not elites. Ensure maximum democracy and rule of law. Compete peacefully in a globalized world. Decentralization is the key. A future state must abandon its territorial monopoly. Power should be delegated to small, autonomous communities that can govern or even “exit” peacefully. Small units lower the risk of violent secession, increase accountability, and accelerate reform. Liechtenstein itself proves the model works: small, sovereign, stable, and cooperative.Realism over utopia. History shows that idealistic state utopias collapse under human nature. But direct democracy and local autonomy provide a pragmatic mechanism to keep power honest, peace sustainable, and freedom real.The state of the future is not a fortress but a network of service communities, competing by quality, not coercion.Essence: Indirect democracy without local participation or exit options degenerates into oligarchy. The state of the third millennium must be decentralized, competitive, accountable &nbsp;a structure that finally serves humanity rather than ruling it.

The Deficiencies of Traditional Democracy — and the State of the Future

Insights and case studies from Chapter 1 of The State in the Third Millennium (Hans-Adam II)Introduction Self-determination is more than a political slogan, it is a design principle for free and peaceful societies. In Chapter 1, Hans-Adam II traces how personal encounters from Algeria to the Basque Country to Switzerland’s Jura shaped his conviction that local self-determination and decentralization are not threats but solutions for multiethnic states, federalism, and modern prosperity.“Democracy appeared to be the only credible alternative to ‘the grace of God.’ However… there was no complete agreement about which model of democracy was the best.” Hans-Adam II, Chapter 1 &nbsp; 1) Personal Formation: From Student to State Thinker As a high-school student in the 1950s, Hans-Adam II was struck by the inconsistency that self-determination seemed to apply to 20,000 Liechtensteiners but not to millions in Algeria. Years later, during a 1966 internship in the Basque Country, he asked the same question exposing the double standard of political practice.“If the right to self-determination applied to the small number of Liechtensteiners, it should also apply to the Basques.” Within his family, closely connected to the Habsburgs, history and global politics were debated rigorously. Consensus emerged that religious legitimation of monarchy had run its course, ideological justifications (nationalism or socialism) led to dead ends, and democracy remained the best option if designed properly.&nbsp; 2) Decolonization and Disillusion: Why Many New States Failed The wave of decolonization brought hope but in many cases, political and economic failure followed, regardless of whether the model was British, French, or American. The rare successes (e.g., Singapore, South Korea) proved the rule and confounded establishment predictions.Core message: Neither size, natural resources, nor a nominal constitution determine success. What matters are institutions, decentralization, market openness, and local legitimacy.&nbsp; 3) Multiethnic States: Lessons from Habsburg, Switzerland, Yugoslavia, and the USSR Habsburg The empire fractured under nationalism. The missed remedy? Radical decentralization and robust local democracy, modeled on Switzerland.“With the example of the Swiss on our doorstep, robust democracy at the local level and political decentralization were the obvious solutions.” Switzerland (Jura Question) The Jura conflict French-speaking Catholics vs. German-speaking Protestants—escalated, but was resolved democratically: referenda, boundary adjustments, local self-determination. A best-practice case.Yugoslavia A counterexample: insisting on inviolable borders, rejecting decentralization resulting in civil war and ethnic cleansing. Hans-Adam II argues a roadmap centered on local self-determination could have averted the catastrophe.Soviet Union He advocated (ex ante) radical reforms: market economy, sharply reduced central competencies, local self-administration, rapid integration into the world economy. Gorbachev’s achievement, as he notes, was a largely peaceful dissolution preventing a potential nuclear calamity.&nbsp; 4) Québec and Canada: Thinking Self-Determination Without Splitting Societies In Québec, nearly half favored independence while English-speaking and Indigenous minorities preferred to stay within Canada. One discussed approach: local self-determination along the St. Lawrence corridor where most French-speakers live, rather than a sweeping secession. Subsequent concessions de-escalated the conflict.Lesson: Use fine-grained tools, not a sledgehammer: draw boundaries around real communities and uphold subsidiarity.&nbsp; 5) Small Beats Big (Economically): The Liechtenstein Argument Contrary to “the bigger the better,” Liechtenstein’s growth after WWII shows:Industry, not stamps, tourism, or only finance, powered the upswing. Open markets, low taxation, and minimal bureaucracy pushed firms toward global competitiveness instead of protected home markets. Small states cannot indulge in the illusion of a large internal market they learn earlier to compete worldwide. “The prevailing belief in ‘the bigger, the better’ was fundamentally false.” Economic point: As transport and trade costs dropped, the scale advantages of large states eroded. Flexibility, innovation, and openness outcompete sheer size.&nbsp; 6) Self-Determination as a Peace Order also in International Law In the early 1990s, Hans-Adam II launched the Liechtenstein Institute on Self-Determination at Princeton and helped draft a UN convention proposing local self-determination channeling centrifugal forces into legal paths rather than violent ruptures.“The right to self-determination is firmly established in the UN Charter… [but] never precisely defined.” Realism: Many states fear disintegration. Yet clear rules for local self-determination can prevent conflict rather than fuel it.&nbsp; 7) Practicing What You Preach: Democratic Legitimacy at Home Criticism of Liechtenstein’s monarchy was taken seriously. The response: strengthen democratic legitimacy and embed local self-determination in Liechtenstein’s own constitution (the broader reform of 2003 is covered later in the book). Credibility abroad starts with consistency at home.“It is not the size of the state… but whether the state serves the people or not.” &nbsp; 8) The Vision: Many Small, Free Polities Instead of Fragile Leviathans He does not call for destroying large states; he calls for decentralizing them down to the municipal level. The result would be many small political units where people can live freely and prosperously.“We should therefore devote our efforts to the creation of numerous small principalities… where people can live in happiness and freedom.” &nbsp; Key Takeaways (Policy, Economy, Society) Subsidiarity first: Push competencies downward. Democracy scales better downward than upward. Borders as tools, not dogma: Draw lines around lived communities to defuse conflict. Markets over walls: Openness and global competitiveness beat protectionism. Diversity is capital: Multiethnic mixes enrich culture and trade if local rights are secured. Form ≠ function: The only test is service to the people; whether monarchy or democracy is secondary to outcomes. &nbsp; Why It Matters Now Geopolitics: Multiethnic tensions, center-periphery divides, and separatist pressures need regulated outlets not binary “all-or-nothing” breaks. Economics: In a networked, digital, Bitcoin-capable world, scale advantages fade; agility wins. Society: Self-determination builds trust people accept decisions made close to where they live. &nbsp; Conclusion Chapter 1 is a rigorous invitation to re-think self-determination: concrete, local, and peace-making not romantic, but practical. It urges us to design political architecture at a human scale and create prosperity from the bottom up.“In principle it is all the same… whether [the state] is a monarchy, oligarchy or democracy, but rather whether the state serves the people or not.” &nbsp; Source Note All quotations and substantive references are from Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein, The State in the Third Millennium, Chapter 1: “The right to self-determination—a personal conviction.”Résumé &nbsp;In the first chapter of The State in the Third Millennium, Prince Hans-Adam II explains how his belief in self-determination grew from personal experience and history. He saw that small nations like Liechtenstein enjoyed a right that millions elsewhere were denied, and he began to question why.Through examples from Europe and beyond, he argues that large, centralized states fail, while peace and prosperity arise when people govern themselves locally. Economically, he shows that small states can thrive through openness and innovation, not size.His conclusion is simple: the value of any state is measured only by whether it serves its people. Real freedom, democracy, and stability come from decentralization and consent, not from power or territory.

The Right to Self-Determination: Why Smaller, Freer Units Create Peace, Liberty, and Prosperity

Bitcoin symbol on a tree stump. Metaphor for 'money grows on trees'

October 31, 2008, 19:10 CET. A quiet email lands on the Cryptography Mailing List of metzdowd.com. The sender: an unknown name — Satoshi Nakamoto. The attachment: a nine-page document that would ignite one of the most profound revolutions in modern history.Its title: “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.”Without fanfare or institutional endorsement, this single message launched a movement that questioned the very foundation of how we understand money, trust, and power. Seventeen years later, the world still celebrates this day as the birth of Bitcoin — and the beginning of a global shift toward financial sovereignty.&nbsp; The Whitepaper: A Blueprint for Freedom Satoshi’s Whitepaper was concise, elegant, and radical. In just over 3,200 words — spread across twelve sections — it proposed a decentralized, peer-to-peer network where individuals could send value directly to one another, without banks or intermediaries.The problem it solved was the “double-spending problem” — how to prevent the same digital coin from being copied or reused — by introducing a chain of cryptographic proof-of-work, what we now call the blockchain.In Satoshi’s own words:“What is needed is an electronic payment system based on cryptographic proof instead of trust.” What began as a technical proposal was in truth a philosophical declaration: a world where money would no longer depend on permission, central banks, or political control.&nbsp; A Date Chosen with Meaning The Whitepaper wasn’t released on a random day. October 31st is also Reformation Day — the anniversary of Martin Luther’s 95 Theses (1517), which sparked the Protestant Reformation. Just as Luther denounced the corruption and centralization of the Church, Satoshi’s publication challenged the financial orthodoxy of our age: the monopolistic power of banks and the state over money.It was a call for a new kind of separation — not between church and state, but between money and state.&nbsp; From Paper to Protocol: The Birth of the Bitcoin Network Less than three months later, on January 3, 2009, Satoshi mined the first-ever Bitcoin block — the Genesis Block. Embedded within it was a message taken from The Times newspaper:“Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks.” That line was more than a timestamp — it was a statement. A critique of the collapsing fiat system and a symbol of Bitcoin’s mission: to create a parallel, voluntary, incorruptible alternative.The Genesis Block rewarded Satoshi with 50 BTC, the first bitcoins ever created. Shortly after, on January 9, 2009, Bitcoin version 0.1 was released on SourceForge, enabling others to run nodes, mine blocks, and verify transactions independently.By January 12, 2009, the first Bitcoin transaction took place: Satoshi Nakamoto sent 10 BTC to Hal Finney, a cryptographer and early cypherpunk pioneer. Bitcoin had officially moved from theory to reality.&nbsp; Inside the Whitepaper Though revolutionary, the Whitepaper was remarkably focused on engineering and clarity. It avoided buzzwords and unnecessary speculation.A few striking details:The term “blockchain” never appears in the original text. Neither does “wallet” or “mining.” The famous 21 million BTC cap is not explicitly mentioned — it emerges mathematically from the protocol itself. Instead, Satoshi used simple, precise language to describe nodes, proof-of-work, and timestamp servers — the foundations of a trustless digital economy.The paper cited only eight references, including the works of cryptography legends like Adam Back (Hashcash) and Wei Dai (b-money), showing both humility and deep understanding of prior research.&nbsp; “I Had to Write the Code First” Satoshi’s meticulousness was legendary. He once wrote to Hal Finney:“I had to write all the code before I could convince myself that I could solve every problem.” He didn’t just imagine Bitcoin — he built it. Before publishing the paper, Satoshi had already written a fully functioning prototype of the network, ensuring it worked before presenting the theory. This reverse order — code before paper — is part of why Bitcoin still works flawlessly today.&nbsp; The Legacy of the Whitepaper Since its release, the Bitcoin Whitepaper has become one of the most cited documents of the 21st century, with over 40,000 academic citations recorded by Google Scholar. It has been translated into 48 languages, including German, Persian, Chinese, and even Braille.It is both a technical standard and a cultural milestone, often compared to the Magna Carta of the digital age.Every year on October 31st, Bitcoiners, builders, and dreamers around the world celebrate this day — not as nostalgia, but as a reminder: that real change doesn’t start with permission, but with courage and code.&nbsp; A New Reformation Just as the Reformation transformed Europe’s religious and political order, Bitcoin is transforming the world’s economic order — one block at a time.Its message is simple, but powerful:Money should be free from corruption. Transactions should be borderless. Privacy is a right, not a privilege. Value should flow peer-to-peer, human-to-human. Bitcoin isn’t just a technology — it’s a new social contract built on voluntary interaction and mathematical truth.&nbsp; Why This Matters Today Seventeen years later, the principles in Satoshi’s paper feel more relevant than ever: Governments print money without restraint. Banks fail, merge, and bail out each other. Centralized digital platforms monetize every click and emotion.Against that backdrop, Bitcoin remains the quiet alternative — transparent, predictable, incorruptible, and free.It’s more than an asset — it’s an infrastructure for freedom.&nbsp; Whitepaper to World — and Beyond From one anonymous message to a trillion-dollar network, the journey from October 31, 2008, to today is a testament to what can happen when one idea meets persistence.Bitcoin inspired not just a financial revolution but a cultural awakening — the rise of open-source money, decentralized innovation, and individual sovereignty.As Satoshi wrote in the Whitepaper’s closing words:“We have proposed a system for electronic transactions without relying on trust.” And perhaps, without realizing it, he also proposed a system for hope — a new model for how humans can collaborate, trade, and live freely in a digital world.&nbsp; Seventeen Years Later — Still Just the Beginning Today, millions of people around the world use Bitcoin to store, send, and secure value — from San Salvador to Zurich, from Lagos to Berlin.But beyond charts and prices, Bitcoin’s real legacy is the mindset it awakened: the belief that we can build systems that serve people, not power.So on this day, we celebrate not just code, but courage. Not just an invention, but a vision. Not just a currency, but a catalyst.Happy Whitepaper Day.<figure id="figure-horsd2hqwrmhet3i8e"><img id="horsd2hqwrmhet3i8e" src="https://media.gettyimages.com/id/1481264166/photo/candle-number-17-cake-birthday-in-rhodamine-red-background.jpg?b=1&s=2048x2048&w=0&k=20&c=O1U1uIQCCld6iPgcdNFZX-E4LZsYBnNh7G10vmugV04=" alt="Candle number 17 - Cake birthday in rhodamine red background" title="Candle number 17 - Cake birthday in rhodamine red background" class="object-cover bg-gray-100 " style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: 50% 40%;" data-corners="default" data-aspect="16:9" data-caption="" data-positionX="50%" data-positionY="40%" data-fullWidth="false"/></figure>

Today in History: The Birth of Bitcoin 17 Years of the Whitepaper That Changed the World

TheraMatch

Business Overview – TheraMatch
TheraMatch is a global, Bitcoin-powered health platform that connects patients directly with trusted providers — doctors, therapists, healers, and coaches — across borders without bureaucracy, insurance middlemen, or payment friction.
For patients, TheraMatch offers the ability to discover providers worldwide, filtered by region, language, and specialty. Sessions can be booked directly, whether online or in person, and payments are settled instantly through Bitcoin Lightning or fiat.
For providers, TheraMatch enables the creation of public profiles including bios, credentials, and offered services. They can manage their availability through an intuitive, Airbnb-style calendar, accept global payments in Bitcoin or fiat, and work independently from local bureaucratic or insurance systems.
For the broader ecosystem, TheraMatch introduces transparent verification layers such as licenses, background checks, and public registers. The platform expands access to care for patients worldwide while opening new income opportunities for providers within a free and borderless market.
TheraMatch stands out through its borderless structure that works anywhere in the world, fast and private payments powered by Bitcoin Lightning and fiat options, and a commitment to freedom by allowing both providers and patients to act outside restrictive systems. Its user experience remains simple and familiar, with a booking flow inspired by the accessibility of Airbnb but designed for health.
The visual identity of TheraMatch reflects its core values: the hummingbird symbolizes agility, vitality, and freedom, while the tin can telephone represents simple yet powerful human connection. The color palette combines deep blue for trust, turquoise for health and vitality, and Bitcoin orange for freedom and innovation.

TheraMatch

Blog

The Hidden Crisis in Healthcare: Why Insurance Systems Re...

Don’t Bow to Authority: What Bitcoin Teaches Us About Thi...

Revolutionizing Health Payments with Bitcoin: The TheraMa...

The Deficiencies of Traditional Democracy — and the State...

The Right to Self-Determination: Why Smaller, Freer Units...

Today in History: The Birth of Bitcoin 17 Years of the Wh...